Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
L
loopy
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Andreas Klöckner
loopy
Commits
63893d99
Commit
63893d99
authored
13 years ago
by
Tim Warburton
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
More MEMO hacking.
parent
b201a4e2
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
MEMO
+12
-10
12 additions, 10 deletions
MEMO
with
12 additions
and
10 deletions
MEMO
+
12
−
10
View file @
63893d99
...
...
@@ -46,25 +46,19 @@ To-do
- user interface for dim length prescription
- Sharing of checks across ILP instances
- Give a good error message if a parameter assignment in get_problems()
is missing.
- Deal with equality constraints.
(These arise, e.g., when partitioning a loop of length 16 into 16s.)
- Slab decomposition for ILP
-> I don't think that's possible.
Future ideas
^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Better for loop bound generation
-> Try a triangular loop
- Nested slab decomposition (in conjunction with conditional hoisting) could
generate nested conditional code.
Future ideas
^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Sharing of checks across ILP instances
- Eliminate the first (pre-)barrier in a loop.
...
...
@@ -87,12 +81,20 @@ Future ideas
- Use gists (why do disjoint sets arise?)
- Nested slab decomposition (in conjunction with conditional hoisting) could
generate nested conditional code.
Dealt with
^^^^^^^^^^
- Slab decomposition for ILP
-> I don't think that's possible.
- It is hard to understand error messages that referred to instructions that
are generated during preprocessing.
-> Expose preprocessing to the user so she can introspect.
-> Expose preprocessing to the user so she can inspect the preprocessed
kernel.
- Which variables need to be duplicated for ILP?
-> Only reduction
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment