- Nov 02, 2011
-
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
If we didn't do this, then the CSE generator would have to anticipate that the CSE compute instruction would need to depend on more inames (those unused hw axes) than actually declared--because previously innocuous-seeming inames could suddenly turn out to be hardware axes.
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
Tim Warburton authored
-
- Nov 01, 2011
-
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
- Oct 31, 2011
-
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
- Oct 30, 2011
-
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
- Oct 29, 2011
-
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
'SequentialTag' was the wrong idea, it impeded sequential unroll. Restrict-to-sequential and tagging have nothing to do with each other. This is now realized in the code.
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
In particular, just touching a variable written to by a non-idempotent instruction makes that instruction also not idempotent.
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-
Andreas Klöckner authored
-